{"id":279,"date":"2022-09-26T09:13:20","date_gmt":"2022-09-26T09:13:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/?page_id=279"},"modified":"2022-10-12T14:35:40","modified_gmt":"2022-10-12T14:35:40","slug":"a-piece-of-art-but-barely-a-backgammon-backgammon-machine","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/index.php\/a-piece-of-art-but-barely-a-backgammon-backgammon-machine\/","title":{"rendered":"A piece of art, but barely a backgammon: Backgammon Machine"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Review<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Quick facts<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>AI strength: advanced (PR 12)<\/li><li>multiplayer: no<\/li><li>tutor \/ analysis: no<\/li><li>price: free, no ads<\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/apps.apple.com\/de\/app\/backgammon-machine\/id1337173672\">app store link<\/a><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Summary: perfect in its design and presentation, it lacks the features that a good backgammon app needs; its AI could use a few million more self-play training matches.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The computer game \u201cDoom\u201d kicked off the whole 3D first person shooter genre. In this classic, you start by selecting a difficulty level. On \u201cI\u2019m too young to die\u201d the game is easy, on \u201cHurt me plenty\u201d it\u2019s fairly hard to beat, but real men (and women) played it on \u201cUltra Violence\u201d for a real challenge. This analogy came to my mind when thinking about why a Backgammon like \u201cBackgammon Machine\u201d that doesn\u2019t include the doubling cube is fun to play, but somehow stale compared to the real thing. Checker play offers plenty of fun, but only by including the cube you turn the game\u2019s challenges from \u201churt me plenty\u201d to \u201cultra violence\u201d.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That said, Backgammon Machine is a special app. It\u2019s really, actually, totally completely free. No ads. No in-app purchases, no virtual coins, no \u201cwatch this video for &lt;feature&gt;\u201d. Free. And beautiful. Man this app is well designed in its pure and beautiful grey look. Steve Jobs would love it. I love it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"762\" src=\"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/3750435B-7A12-4883-9F8E-FFDEC9163DAA-1024x762.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-280\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/3750435B-7A12-4883-9F8E-FFDEC9163DAA-1024x762.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/3750435B-7A12-4883-9F8E-FFDEC9163DAA-300x223.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/3750435B-7A12-4883-9F8E-FFDEC9163DAA-768x571.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/3750435B-7A12-4883-9F8E-FFDEC9163DAA-1536x1143.jpeg 1536w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/3750435B-7A12-4883-9F8E-FFDEC9163DAA-2048x1524.jpeg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>The cleanest possible backgammon UI<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>But its beauty doesn\u2019t stop at only visual appearance. Its user experience is also top notch &#8211; the way you move your checkers, how you undo is just perfect. For example: you roll 6\/3, move a checker by 6 pips. Now if you tap on this checker, the app will highlight two target places &#8211; 6 back (to undo the 6) and 3 back (to turn the 6 into the 3). Very clever, have not seen this anywhere else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"768\" src=\"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/E645E04C-A14D-4EC9-9209-6905C8ABD02E-1024x768.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-281\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/E645E04C-A14D-4EC9-9209-6905C8ABD02E-1024x768.png 1024w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/E645E04C-A14D-4EC9-9209-6905C8ABD02E-300x225.png 300w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/E645E04C-A14D-4EC9-9209-6905C8ABD02E-768x576.png 768w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/E645E04C-A14D-4EC9-9209-6905C8ABD02E-1536x1151.png 1536w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/E645E04C-A14D-4EC9-9209-6905C8ABD02E.png 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>The option screen is clean and beautiful, but somewhat limited<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Concerning features, this is pretty much it. You start a game in \u201cmatch to 1 pt\u201d mode. You make your moves (enjoyable). It makes its moves. You start another game in \u201cmatch to 1 pt\u201d mode. And so on. No tutor\/analysis, no setup, no matches, no doubling, no exporting, no manual dice, you get the picture :-).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Oh yes, and the UI is so clean that it doesn\u2019t show a pip count. The joys of counting pips by hand (strengthening my \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1HVZ16CDjVmcH_fK2l3giedqwForgpnLmB5aRF_j1pmc\/mobilebasic\">criss-cross pip counting<\/a> skills\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But maybe that\u2019s enough. Play against a strong, free AI can be fun, at least for a casual backgammon in between meetings or such, even without matches, without doubling. So all boils down to the question: is the AI any good? The answer is yes and no. It certainly plays a stronger game than the AIs that have been hand-crafted in a rush. It certainly plays a weaker game than then high-end AIs of XG, BGBlitz, BG NJ.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/FE7E05EF-3BB5-44B9-9388-EF481E822005-1024x768.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-282\" width=\"840\" height=\"630\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/FE7E05EF-3BB5-44B9-9388-EF481E822005-1024x768.png 1024w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/FE7E05EF-3BB5-44B9-9388-EF481E822005-300x225.png 300w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/FE7E05EF-3BB5-44B9-9388-EF481E822005-768x576.png 768w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/FE7E05EF-3BB5-44B9-9388-EF481E822005-1536x1151.png 1536w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/FE7E05EF-3BB5-44B9-9388-EF481E822005.png 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 840px) 100vw, 840px\" \/><figcaption>If you\u2019re a halfway good backgammon player you can get a good shareof wins against the machine<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>I\u2018ve played 18 games so far, and lead 12:6 against the AI. I feel I was fairly lucky sometimes, but I\u2018ve also seen it going for significant blunders. For example, in a situation where I\u2018m bearing off against 1 or 2 trapped checkers it moves those trapped checkers home far too early (considering it doesn\u2018t treat a gammon as 2 points it should wait it out as long as possible). Or take this one:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"768\" src=\"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/8150413C-06F5-4831-8DA4-DA929650F787-1024x768.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-283\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/8150413C-06F5-4831-8DA4-DA929650F787-1024x768.png 1024w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/8150413C-06F5-4831-8DA4-DA929650F787-300x225.png 300w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/8150413C-06F5-4831-8DA4-DA929650F787-768x576.png 768w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/8150413C-06F5-4831-8DA4-DA929650F787-1536x1151.png 1536w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/8150413C-06F5-4831-8DA4-DA929650F787.png 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>The Machine\u2019s rather\u2026 unconventional\u2026 64 opening<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>This 6\/4 opening, according to XG2, is nearly a blunder (losing 0.072 equity). This is way too loose, it will be hard for me to roll something that doesn\u2019t hit, and hit on a point I want to make. Not something an app that claims to play at nearly master strength would do. When checking the app for my big ranking table, XG2 concluded that it plays on strong expert level (nearly world class) with a PR of 5.2. But keep in mind, this app can\u2019t blunder difficult doubles, because it can\u2019t double. I\u2019ve seen a number of apps playing a strong checker game, but blunder with doubles (and so do I).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nevertheless this app plays a good game of Backgammon, certainly better than many of the \u201cbeginner\u201d level Backgammons out there, and as it\u2019s fast, fun, free and beautiful, it\u2019s great for a fast, casual game of backgammon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So, just install it and have fun. Just don\u2019t expect too much. I hope the author invests more into self-playing to improve its strength, and into a few more features. Matches would be great.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Update &#8211; September 2022: played another few games against it, recorded\/analyzed with XG2, and have to adjust its rating to &#8220;advanced&#8221; with a PR of 12. The games were difficult, and the Machine made its share of blunders, some very severe like this one:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"716\" src=\"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/machineblunder-1024x716.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-298\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/machineblunder-1024x716.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/machineblunder-300x210.jpg 300w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/machineblunder-768x537.jpg 768w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/machineblunder-1536x1074.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/machineblunder-2048x1432.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>White to play 44<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Every beginner will find out that the 44 is a wonderful way to bring this game home safely. You can get all three blots to safety, and the one on 17 is safe for now; should I roll a 6, the 17 blot can help hit one of the blots. So 12\/4 7\/3 10\/6 is the obvious move. The Machine decided to do the opposite and moved 17\/5 10\/6, leaving a direct hit on 7 for no good reason (and an indirect shot on 12), a -0.184 blunder. And as the dice gods want it, I rolled 65 and won the game.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I&#8217;ll play some more and see if the rating changes. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Review Quick facts AI strength: advanced (PR 12) multiplayer: no tutor \/ analysis: no price: free, no ads app store link Summary: perfect in its design and presentation, it lacks the features that a good backgammon app needs; its AI could use a few million more self-play training matches. The computer game \u201cDoom\u201d kicked off [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-279","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=279"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/279\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":357,"href":"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/279\/revisions\/357"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gammonrants.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}